To use our advanced search functionality (to search for terms in specific content), please use syntax such as the following examples:
The benefits of male circumcision (MC) have been contested by many including medical professionals in recent decades. But evidence supporting the practice has grown steadily. Last month, the most definitive study yet was published in a professional medical journal.
Researchers from the University of Sydney performed an in-depth quantitative analysis of nearly 200 articles and studies on MC. They found “overwhelming evidence” in support of the practice. “Circumcision reduces the risk of infections, cancer and other painful conditions and should be routinely carried out on newborn boys” (New Zealand Herald, March 8, 2012). “Adverse effects are uncommon (<1%), and virtually all are minor and easily treated” (there is no evidence of negative mental or psychological effects on infants and children).
In the view of these researchers, “The ethics of infant MC and childhood vaccination are comparable. Our analysis finds MC is beneficial, safe and cost-effective, and should optimally be performed in infancy. In the interests of public health and individual wellbeing, adequate parental education, and steps to facilitate access and affordability should be encouraged in developed countries” (Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, February 2012).
Nearly 4000 years ago, God began the practice of MC with Abraham (Genesis 17:10), and He instructed the people of Israel to continue the practice (Leviticus 12:3). While MC is no longer a spiritual requirement (see Acts 15), many health benefits clearly remain.